`
1025250620
  • 浏览: 225628 次
  • 性别: Icon_minigender_1
  • 来自: 北京
社区版块
存档分类
最新评论

Proguard 源码分析 (七) 混淆

 
阅读更多

本章我们讲Proguard非常重要的一个步骤:混淆Obfuscator

混淆的目的很明显,是为了混淆语义。

我们能轻车熟路的找到混淆的源头:

Obfuscator 的execute方法

我们来看一下就行混淆器给我们设置了怎样的访问者:

ClassVisitor memberInfoLinker =
            configuration.useUniqueClassMemberNames ?
                (ClassVisitor)new AllMemberVisitor(new MethodLinker()) :
                (ClassVisitor)new BottomClassFilter(new MethodLinker());

我们直接跟到最终的访问者,也就是MethodLinker

 

public void visitAnyClass(Clazz clazz)
    {
        // Collect all non-private members in this class hierarchy.
        clazz.hierarchyAccept(true, true, true, false,
            new AllMethodVisitor(
            new MemberAccessFilter(0, ClassConstants.INTERNAL_ACC_PRIVATE | ClassConstants.INTERNAL_ACC_STATIC,
            this)));

        // Clean up for the next class hierarchy.
        memberMap.clear();
    }

它的意思是说将自己作为AllMethodVisitor 所有方法中,MemberAccessFilter可接受的访问权限的访问者,

既然它的目的很明显是为了处理方法,我们直接跟到相关的调用:

public void visitAnyMember(Clazz clazz, Member member)
    {
        String name       = member.getName(clazz);
        String descriptor = member.getDescriptor(clazz);
        if (name.equals(ClassConstants.INTERNAL_METHOD_NAME_CLINIT) ||
            name.equals(ClassConstants.INTERNAL_METHOD_NAME_INIT))
        {
            return;
        }
        String key = name + ' ' + descriptor;
        Member otherMember = (Member)memberMap.get(key);

        if (otherMember == null)
        {
            Member thisLastMember = lastMember(member);
            memberMap.put(key, thisLastMember);
        } else {
            link(member, otherMember);
        }
    }

我们看到刚开始它会先取得方法的名称和签名,对于cinit 和init不做处理,注释便是最好的源码解析:

// Special cases: <clinit> and <init> are always kept unchanged.
        // We can ignore them here.

之后将通过签名来找到享元池中的方法Member otherMember = (Member)memberMap.get(key);

if (otherMember == null)
        {
            // Get the last method in the chain.
            Member thisLastMember = lastMember(member);

            // Store the new class method in the map.
            memberMap.put(key, thisLastMember);
        }
        else
        {
            // Link both members.
            link(member, otherMember);
        }

如果没有这个方法,便加入到享元池中,但是之前调用了lastMember

我们来看一下lastMember 方法:

 public static Member lastMember(Member member)
    {
        Member lastMember = member;
        while (lastMember.getVisitorInfo() != null &&
               lastMember.getVisitorInfo() instanceof Member)
        {
            lastMember = (Member)lastMember.getVisitorInfo();
        }

        return lastMember;
    }

也就是说如果它的visitor信息里面如果存在,则直接返回上一个的方法,这种写法很类似于职责链模式,但我只是猜测,只是有职责链的感觉,我们继续往下看,如果方法已经存在了呢?~

我们回到clazz.hierarchyAccept 的参数:

 public void hierarchyAccept(boolean      visitThisClass, //true
                                boolean      visitSuperClass, //true
                                boolean      visitInterfaces, //true
                                boolean      visitSubclasses,//false
                                ClassVisitor classVisitor);

这里面很可能存在一个方法visitThisClass,visitSuperClass,visitInterfaces都存在的情况

所以link(member, otherMember); 的目的就是为了合并到一个共同的职责链源头

 

好的我们继续混淆的过程:

NameMarker nameMarker = new NameMarker();
        ClassPoolVisitor classPoolvisitor =
            ClassSpecificationVisitorFactory.createClassPoolVisitor(configuration.keep,
                                                                    nameMarker,
                                                                    nameMarker,
                                                                    false,
                                                                    false,
                                                                    true);

前文好几次提到了ClassSpecificationVisitorFactory.createClassPoolVisitor 这个方法,我们不做深究我们直接看NameMarker

 

public void visitProgramClass(ProgramClass programClass)
    {
        keepClassName(programClass);

        // Make sure any outer class names are kept as well.
        programClass.attributesAccept(this);
    }

public void keepClassName(Clazz clazz)
    {
        ClassObfuscator.setNewClassName(clazz,
                                        clazz.getName());
    }

 static void setNewClassName(Clazz clazz, String name)
    {
        clazz.setVisitorInfo(name);
    }

可见:keepClassName 的目的就是为了往VisitorInfo 设置name 标签

public void visitAnyAttribute(Clazz clazz, Attribute attribute) {}

说明它对属性并没有任何的访问操作:

接着由于库文件没有必要混淆,所以要将库文件保持签名

 libraryClassPool.classesAccept(nameMarker);
        libraryClassPool.classesAccept(new AllMemberVisitor(nameMarker));

 

接着:

 // Mark attributes that have to be kept.
        AttributeVisitor attributeUsageMarker =
            new NonEmptyAttributeFilter(
            new AttributeUsageMarker());

        AttributeVisitor optionalAttributeUsageMarker =
            configuration.keepAttributes == null ? null :
                new AttributeNameFilter(new ListParser(new NameParser()).parse(configuration.keepAttributes),
                                        attributeUsageMarker);

        programClassPool.classesAccept(
            new AllAttributeVisitor(true,
            new RequiredAttributeFilter(attributeUsageMarker,
                                        optionalAttributeUsageMarker)));

这是对class的属性做标记,接着我们省略掉无关紧要的代码我们直接看混淆的主要访问者

 programClassPool.classesAccept(
            new ClassObfuscator(programClassPool,
                                classNameFactory,
                                packageNameFactory,
                                configuration.useMixedCaseClassNames,
                                configuration.keepPackageNames,
                                configuration.flattenPackageHierarchy,
                                configuration.repackageClasses,
                                configuration.allowAccessModification));

我们可以跟到对于混淆的名是通过:

String name    = programClass.getName();
        String newName = ClassObfuscator.newClassName(programClass);

来生成的而ClassObfuscator.newClassName

实际上是放回访问者的访问标志,而这个标记值是通过ClassObfuscator的

 public void visitProgramClass(ProgramClass programClass)
    {
        // Does this class still need a new name?
        newClassName = newClassName(programClass);
        if (newClassName == null)
        {
            // Make sure the outer class has a name, if it exists. The name will
            // be stored as the new class name, as a side effect, so we'll be
            // able to use it as a prefix.
            programClass.attributesAccept(this);

            // Figure out a package prefix. The package prefix may actually be
            // the an outer class prefix, if any, or it may be the fixed base
            // package, if classes are to be repackaged.
            String newPackagePrefix = newClassName != null ?
                newClassName + ClassConstants.INTERNAL_INNER_CLASS_SEPARATOR :
                newPackagePrefix(ClassUtil.internalPackagePrefix(programClass.getName()));

            // Come up with a new class name, numeric or ordinary.
            newClassName = newClassName != null && numericClassName ?
                generateUniqueNumericClassName(newPackagePrefix) :
                generateUniqueClassName(newPackagePrefix);

            setNewClassName(programClass, newClassName);
        }
    }

来设置的。而对于采用keep标记的那些值,在调用 newClassName(programClass);会放回keep访问者标记的值就不走if中的语句块,这样就达到了只针对非keep中的参数混淆的效果。我们来看一下它是如何给定名字的吧:

private String generateUniqueClassName(String newPackagePrefix)

 

 private String generateUniqueClassName(String      newPackagePrefix,
                                           NameFactory classNameFactory)
    {
        // Come up with class names until we get an original one.
        String newClassName;
        String newMixedCaseClassName;
        do
        {
            // Let the factory produce a class name.
            newClassName = newPackagePrefix +
                           classNameFactory.nextName();
           
            newMixedCaseClassName = mixedCaseClassName(newClassName);
        }
        while (classNamesToAvoid.contains(newMixedCaseClassName));

        // Explicitly make sure the name isn't used again if we have a
        // user-specified dictionary and we're not allowed to have mixed case
        // class names -- just to protect against problematic dictionaries.
        if (this.classNameFactory != null &&
            !useMixedCaseClassNames)
        {
            classNamesToAvoid.add(newMixedCaseClassName);
        }

        return newClassName;
    }
    {
        // Find the right name factory for this package.
        NameFactory classNameFactory =
            (NameFactory)packagePrefixClassNameFactoryMap.get(newPackagePrefix);
        if (classNameFactory == null)
        {
            // We haven't seen classes in this package before.
            // Create a new name factory for them.
            classNameFactory = new SimpleNameFactory(useMixedCaseClassNames);
            if (this.classNameFactory != null)
            {
                classNameFactory =
                    new DictionaryNameFactory(this.classNameFactory,
                                              classNameFactory);
            }

            packagePrefixClassNameFactoryMap.put(newPackagePrefix,
                                                 classNameFactory);
        }

        return generateUniqueClassName(newPackagePrefix, classNameFactory);
    }

 

 可见,是通过调用工厂来生成下一个匹配的名字,而且每一个包对应一个工厂,Proguard中有很多的命名工厂类的实现,我们直接用默认的命名工厂类:SimpleNameFactory

 private String name(int index)
    {
        // Which cache do we need?
        List cachedNames = generateMixedCaseNames ?
            cachedMixedCaseNames :
            cachedLowerCaseNames;

        // Do we have the name in the cache?
        if (index < cachedNames.size())
        {
            return (String)cachedNames.get(index);
        }

private String newName(int index)
    {
        // If we're allowed to generate mixed-case names, we can use twice as
        // many characters.
        int totalCharacterCount = generateMixedCaseNames ?
            2 * CHARACTER_COUNT :
            CHARACTER_COUNT;

int baseIndex = index / totalCharacterCount;
        int offset    = index % totalCharacterCount;

        char newChar = charAt(offset);

        String newName = baseIndex == 0 ?
            new String(new char[] { newChar }) :
            (name(baseIndex-1) + newChar);

        return newName;
    }

        // Create a new name and cache it.
        String name = newName(index);
        cachedNames.add(index, name);

        return name;
    }
我们看到它的命名规则非常简单~~就是采用26个字母顺序使用,然后依次扩展.

接下来我们来看下如何将这些规则应用到字节码库中:      

我们看到访问者:

public void visitProgramClass(ProgramClass programClass)
    {
        // Rename this class.
        programClass.thisClassConstantAccept(this);

        // Rename the class members.
        programClass.fieldsAccept(this);
        programClass.methodsAccept(this);
    }

 

ClassRenamer 它对常量的访问操作是:

public void visitClassConstant(Clazz clazz, ClassConstant classConstant)
    {
        // Update the Class entry if required.
        String newName = ClassObfuscator.newClassName(clazz);
        if (newName != null)
        {
            // Refer to a new Utf8 entry.
            classConstant.u2nameIndex =
                new ConstantPoolEditor((ProgramClass)clazz).addUtf8Constant(newName);
        }
    }

很容易看出,实际上它是将常量池对应的索引数据替换成它的新数据,

我们看下它对member的操作吧:

 public void visitProgramMember(ProgramClass  programClass,
                                     ProgramMember programMember)
    {
        // Has the class member name changed?
        String name    = programMember.getName(programClass);
        String newName = MemberObfuscator.newMemberName(programMember);
        if (newName != null &&
            !newName.equals(name))
        {
            programMember.u2nameIndex =
                new ConstantPoolEditor(programClass).addUtf8Constant(newName);
        }
    }

还是一样的道理,先对member定义个一个新的名字,然后替换掉常量中的数据。

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

分享到:
评论

相关推荐

    springboot工程(单个maven工程)利用proguard实现代码混淆

    基于springboot搭建一个简单案例,利用proguard插件实现代码混淆,增加源代码的阅读和理解的难度, 并不能百分百保证代码安全。常用的应用场景是项目需要部署到客户机器上,一定程度上防止代码泄露。 ProGuard 是一个...

    proguard混淆打包工具

    proguard混淆打包工具proguard混淆打包工具proguard混淆打包工具

    proguard工具jar包混淆

    proguard最新版jar包混淆工具,能使部署的jar包不让对方破解

    proguard 混淆 demo

    混淆了四天,亲测可用,建议先从网上浏览proguard用法,特别是四步骤中混淆那一步,最重要,及验证是否能够省略

    proguard5.2.1java代码混淆工具

    proguard5.2.1java代码混淆工具,混淆文档参照 http://download.csdn.net/detail/zysap/9684388

    proguard4.6beta2 混淆包

    proguard 4.6 beta2 混淆包 J2ME java 更新 4.5

    ProGuard-java混淆加密

    ProGuard能够对Java类中的代码进行压缩(Shrink),优化(Optimize),混淆(Obfuscate),预检(Preveirfy)。  1. 压缩(Shrink):在压缩处理这一步中,用于检测和删除没有使用的类,字段,方法和属性。  2. 优化...

    android proguard5.3.3混淆包

    android proguard5.3.3混淆包 替换Jar包以后使 混淆的类名方法名变成空白 使用方法 直接 替换 5.3.3版本的 混淆jar包 Mac 路径为 Contents/gradle/m2repository/net/sf/proguard/proguard-base Win gradle/m2...

    proguard6.1.1.zip 混淆利器

    ProGuard是最受欢迎的Java字节码优化器。它使您的Java和Android应用程序缩小了90%,速度提高了20%。ProGuard还通过模糊类,字段和方法的名称来提供对逆向工程的最小保护。 ProGuard可以免费使用,以处理您的应用...

    proguard程序混淆器

    proguard3.2是J2ME程序混淆器 J2ME环境下最好的混淆器

    proguard混淆步骤操作流程

    jar包的混淆工具(proguard5.3.3)及其混淆步骤,错误解决!

    java代码混淆器proGuard

    java代码混淆器proGuard,可以混淆函数变量、类、方法名以实现代码加密

    使用Proguard混淆Java源代码

    java代码很容易被反编译,可通过混淆技术来保护源码,此处我们应用开源项目proguard来进行混淆。操作使用详见:http://blog.csdn.net/odian1/article/details/8282799

    解决proguard混淆报错-Proguard5.1

    proguard混淆jar包提示错误:Unknown verification type [*] in stack map frame 解决方案:找到proguard源码中proguard\src\proguard\classfile\ClassConstants.java类,然后修改ATTR_StackMapTable的值,将原来的...

    修改Proguard混淆规则,自定义字符集

    修改Proguard混淆规则,自定义字符集,使用详情https://blog.csdn.net/u011106915/article/details/84636592

    通过proguard5.2.1代码混淆工具和简单说明

    本实例使用的是把web项目中的源码(src)所有文件打包成jar文件,使用proguard混淆后再把jar文件以及jar解压后的混淆class类文件替换原war项目的相应位置即可。 混淆过程中需要使用keep参数来保持原有一些属性、注解...

    proguard界面混淆版

    proguard界面混淆版4.2,能够混淆JAVA程序,非常优秀的东西

    proguard(java代码混淆器)v5.3.3官方版

    proguard是一个java代码混淆工具,并提供了图形化用户界面,它也可以结合Ant或J2ME Wireless Toolkit使用。通过ProGuard得到的更精简的jar文件意味着只需要更小的存储空间混淆环节会用无意义的短变量去重命名类、...

    实现maven管理的Javaweb项目的proguard代码混淆功能

    实现maven管理的Javaweb项目的proguard代码混淆功能、工具包下载及错误解决

Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics