`

Netty源码学习-DefaultChannelPipeline2

阅读更多
Netty3的API
http://docs.jboss.org/netty/3.2/api/org/jboss/netty/channel/ChannelPipeline.html
里面提到ChannelPipeline的一个“pitfall”:
如果ChannelPipeline只有一个handler(假设为handlerA)且希望用另一handler(假设为handlerB)
来取代handlerA去完成剩下的工作,那就要先add handlerB再remove handerA:


Pitfall

Due to the internal implementation detail of the current default ChannelPipeline, the following code does not work as expected if FirstHandler is the last handler in the pipeline:

 public class FirstHandler extends SimpleChannelUpstreamHandler {

     @Override
     public void messageReceived(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, MessageEvent e) {
         // Remove this handler from the pipeline,
         ctx.getPipeline().remove(this);
         // And let SecondHandler handle the current event.
         ctx.getPipeline().addLast("2nd", new SecondHandler());
         ctx.sendUpstream(e);
     }
 }
 


正确的做法是
        ctx.getPipeline().addLast("2nd", new SecondHandler());
ctx.getPipeline().remove(this);

我的测试代码:
https://github.com/bylijinnan/nettyLearn/tree/master/ljn-netty3-learn/src/main/java/com/ljn/handler/pitfall

这是为什么呢?

问题出在ctx.sendUpstream(e):

public class DefaultChannelPipeline implements ChannelPipeline {

    private final class DefaultChannelHandlerContext implements ChannelHandlerContext {

		public void sendUpstream(ChannelEvent e) {
			
			//下面的this是DefaultChannelHandlerContext
            DefaultChannelHandlerContext next = getActualUpstreamContext(this.next);
            if (next != null) {
                DefaultChannelPipeline.this.sendUpstream(next, e);
            }
        }
	}
	
}
		


当ChannelPipe只有一个handler(也就是只有一个ChannelHandlerContext,代码中的ctx)时,
ctx.next = null
在sendUpstream方法的
DefaultChannelHandlerContext next = getActualUpstreamContext(this.next);
返回的next=null,没有继续往下执行
因此Upstream的处理就中断了

不熟悉ChannelPipeline流程的可以先看看这篇文章:http://bylijinnan.iteye.com/blog/1981763
0
0
分享到:
评论

相关推荐

Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics