`
victorzhzh
  • 浏览: 202079 次
  • 来自: ...
社区版块
存档分类
最新评论

阻塞方法引起的任务无法结束

阅读更多

做一个小练习记录一个阻塞方法引起的任务无法结束。

场景如下:一个生成质素的类,多个线程调用这个类生成一系列质素。

质素生成类:

public class PrimeGeneratorForeverRun implements
		Callable<BlockingQueue<BigInteger>> {
	private final BlockingQueue<BigInteger> primes = new ArrayBlockingQueue<BigInteger>(
			5);//使用阻塞队列来存储已经生成的质素
	private volatile boolean cancelled = false;//退出条件
	private static BigInteger b = BigInteger.ONE;

	@Override
	public BlockingQueue<BigInteger> call() throws Exception {
		System.out.println("Begin Time: " + new Date());
		while (!cancelled) {
			TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(1);
			synchronized (this) {
				b = b.nextProbablePrime();
				primes.put(b);
			}
		}
		System.out.println("End Time: " + new Date());
		return primes;
	}

	public void cancel() {//当外部调用这个方法时,将时call中的while循环退出
		cancelled = true;
	}
}

 测试类:

public class PrimeGeneratorForeverRunTest {

	/**
	 * @param args
	 */
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		PrimeGeneratorForeverRun primeGenerator = new PrimeGeneratorForeverRun();//定义一个单例的质素生成器
		ExecutorService service = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(2);//定义线程池的大小为2
		Future<BlockingQueue<BigInteger>> result1 = service.submit(primeGenerator);//提交任务
		Future<BlockingQueue<BigInteger>> result2 = service.submit(primeGenerator);
		try {
			TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(10);//守护线程沉睡10秒,目的是向在10秒内让任务1,2不停的生成质素
		} catch (Exception e) {
			e.printStackTrace();
		} finally {
			primeGenerator.cancel();//停止生成质素
			service.shutdown();//关闭线程池,这里使用平滑关闭,目的是不强制退出任何线程
			try {
				BlockingQueue<BigInteger> list = result1.get();//获取第一个任务生成的所有质素
				for (BigInteger bigInteger : list) {
					System.out.print(bigInteger + ",");
				}
				System.out.println();
				list = result2.get();
				for (BigInteger bigInteger : list) {//获取第二个任务生成的所有质素
					System.out.print(bigInteger + ",");
				}
			} catch (InterruptedException e) {
				e.printStackTrace();
			} catch (ExecutionException e) {
				e.printStackTrace();
			}
		}
	}

}

 运行测试类,程序死掉了,一直在运行,查看JVM线程栈信息:

Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (17.0-b16 mixed mode):

"Attach Listener" daemon prio=10 tid=0x08e7ec00 nid=0x4392 waiting on condition [0x00000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE

   Locked ownable synchronizers:
	- None

"pool-1-thread-2" prio=10 tid=0x08e70400 nid=0x4369 waiting on condition [0x7b629000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
	at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	- parking to wait for  <0xa285ddf0> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:158)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)
	at java.util.concurrent.ArrayBlockingQueue.put(ArrayBlockingQueue.java:252)
	at org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.call(PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.java:24)
	- locked <0xa285db78> (a org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRun)
	at org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.call(PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.java:1)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)

   Locked ownable synchronizers:
	- <0xa285e710> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync)

"pool-1-thread-1" prio=10 tid=0x08e6cc00 nid=0x4368 waiting for monitor entry [0x7b87a000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
	at org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.call(PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.java:23)
	- waiting to lock <0xa285db78> (a org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRun)
	at org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.call(PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.java:1)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)

   Locked ownable synchronizers:
	- <0xa285e520> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync)

"Low Memory Detector" daemon prio=10 tid=0x08e57400 nid=0x4366 runnable [0x00000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE

   Locked ownable synchronizers:
	- None

"CompilerThread1" daemon prio=10 tid=0x08e54000 nid=0x4365 waiting on condition [0x00000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE

   Locked ownable synchronizers:
	- None

"CompilerThread0" daemon prio=10 tid=0x08e52000 nid=0x4364 waiting on condition [0x00000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE

   Locked ownable synchronizers:
	- None

"Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=10 tid=0x08e50400 nid=0x4363 runnable [0x00000000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE

   Locked ownable synchronizers:
	- None

"Finalizer" daemon prio=10 tid=0x08e3dc00 nid=0x4362 in Object.wait() [0x7be83000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
	at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
	- waiting on <0xa2820b10> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
	at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:118)
	- locked <0xa2820b10> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
	at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:134)
	at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:159)

   Locked ownable synchronizers:
	- None

"Reference Handler" daemon prio=10 tid=0x08e3c400 nid=0x4361 in Object.wait() [0x7bed4000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
	at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
	- waiting on <0xa2820a18> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
	at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:485)
	at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:116)
	- locked <0xa2820a18> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)

   Locked ownable synchronizers:
	- None

"main" prio=10 tid=0x08db0400 nid=0x435d waiting on condition [0xb6b1a000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
	at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	- parking to wait for  <0xa285e4c0> (a java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:158)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:811)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:969)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireSharedInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1281)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerGet(FutureTask.java:218)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:83)
	at org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRunTest.main(PrimeGeneratorForeverRunTest.java:30)

   Locked ownable synchronizers:
	- None

"VM Thread" prio=10 tid=0x08e39800 nid=0x4360 runnable 

"GC task thread#0 (ParallelGC)" prio=10 tid=0x08db7800 nid=0x435e runnable 

"GC task thread#1 (ParallelGC)" prio=10 tid=0x08db9000 nid=0x435f runnable 

"VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=10 tid=0x08e59000 nid=0x4367 waiting on condition 

JNI global references: 855

 主要看,如下信息:

"pool-1-thread-2" prio=10 tid=0x08e70400 nid=0x4369 waiting on condition [0x7b629000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
	at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	- parking to wait for  <0xa285ddf0> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:158)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)
	at java.util.concurrent.ArrayBlockingQueue.put(ArrayBlockingQueue.java:252)
	at org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.call(PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.java:24)
	- locked <0xa285db78> (a org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRun)
	at org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.call(PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.java:1)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)

   Locked ownable synchronizers:
	- <0xa285e710> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync)

"pool-1-thread-1" prio=10 tid=0x08e6cc00 nid=0x4368 waiting for monitor entry [0x7b87a000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
	at org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.call(PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.java:23)
	- waiting to lock <0xa285db78> (a org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRun)
	at org.victorzhzh.concurrency.PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.call(PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.java:1)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)

   Locked ownable synchronizers:
	- <0xa285e520> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync)

 由于阻塞队列满了,所以pool-1-thread-2进入了等待状态,而由于pool-1-thread-2锁住了PrimeGeneratorForeverRun对象,所以pool-1-thread-1进入了阻塞状态,因此即使这时我们调用了PrimeGeneratorForeverRun.cancel()方法,也无法停止生成质素的循环,因为线程一个处于等待状态,一个处于阻塞状态,都不能取校验cancelled标志位,所以线程只能保持源状态继续,而守护线程中我们用的是shutdown,只要有线程在运行那么线程池就不会关闭,因此程序将一直运行。

解决方法很容易了,这里就不再列出。

分享到:
评论
7 楼 cangchen8180 2016-10-21  
这个问题怎么解决的啊,能不能分享一下???[b][/b]
6 楼 lshxy320 2014-05-27  
解决方法很容易???怎么解决的啊?
5 楼 pjfox163 2013-06-28  
primes.put(b);
这里try一下就可以了,原因是阻塞队列最大是5,当第六个值往里放得时候抛异常了。所有一直没有返回primes这个队列,所有一直等待。
或者改成primes.offer(b)这个直接返回boolean型不会抛异常。
4 楼 luoaz 2012-09-03  
楼主,这个问题怎么解决的啊,能不能分享一下,我们现在遇到了这个问题,但不知道怎么解决
3 楼 azhu1123 2012-02-13  
真心求解决办法说明……自己有尝试集中方式,都没有解决。谢谢
2 楼 agapple 2011-05-06  
看走眼,原来你只是使用了一个boolean标志位。
1 楼 agapple 2011-05-06  
cancel的支持,无非是通过Thread.intrupte,需要对应的runnable支持,这在我们目前很多开发编程中缺少这样的意识。

可以换另一种思路,runnable线程实现一个可cancel的操作,每次异步线程进行Thread.intrupte操作时,通过Thread特定的钩子主动调用runnable的cancel方法。

相关推荐

Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics