引用
struts1用了一年,到现在也有一年没用了.webwork用了快一年了.现在又开始转向struts.这两天开始看struts2.感觉struts2跟webwork简直就是一个东西.换汤不换药.看了文档才知道原来struts2=struts1+webwork.所以也很容易上手了. struts2文档里记录下来的 struts1与struts2的比较.
1.Action classes :
- Struts1:Struts 1 requires Action classes to extend an abstract base class. A common problem in Struts 1 is programming to abstract classes instead of interfaces.
- Struts2:An Struts 2 Action may implement an Action interface, along with other interfaces to enable optional and custom services. Struts 2 provides a base ActionSupport class to implement commonly used interfaces. Albeit, the Action interface is not required. Any POJO object with a execute signature can be used as an Struts 2 Action object.
2.Threading Model :
- Struts1:Struts 1 Actions are singletons and must be thread-safe since there will only be one instance of a class to handle all requests for that Action. The singleton strategy places restrictions on what can be done with Struts 1 Actions and requires extra care to develop. Action resources must be thread-safe or synchronized.
- Struts2:Struts 2 Action objects are instantiated for each request, so there are no thread-safety issues. (In practice, servlet containers generate many throw-away objects per request, and one more object does not impose a performance penalty or impact garbage collection.)
3.Servlet Dependency :
- Struts1:Struts 1 Actions have dependencies on the servlet API since the HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse is passed to the execute method when an Action is invoked.
- Struts2:Struts 2 Actions are not coupled to a container. Most often the servlet contexts are represented as simple Maps, allowing Actions to be tested in isolation. Struts 2 Actions can still access the original request and response, if required. However, other architectural elements reduce or eliminate the need to access the HttpServetRequest or HttpServletResponse directly.
4.Testability :
- Struts1:A major hurdle to testing Struts 1 Actions is that the execute method exposes the Servlet API. A third-party extension, Struts TestCase, offers a set of mock object for Struts 1.
- Struts2:Struts 2 Actions can be tested by instantiating the Action, setting properties, and invoking methods. Dependency Injection support also makes testing simpler.
5.Harvesting Input :
- Struts1:Struts 1 uses an ActionForm object to capture input. Like Actions, all ActionForms must extend a base class. Since other JavaBeans cannot be used as ActionForms, developers often create redundant classes to capture input. DynaBeans can used as an alternative to creating conventional ActionForm classes, but, here too, developers may be redescribing existing JavaBeans.
- Struts2:Struts 2 uses Action properties as input properties, eliminating the need for a second input object. Input properties may be rich object types which may have their own properties. The Action properties can be accessed from the web page via the taglibs. Struts 2 also supports the ActionForm pattern, as well as POJO form objects and POJO Actions. Rich object types, including business or domain objects, can be used as input/output objects. The ModelDriven feature simplifies taglb references to POJO input objects.
6.Expression Language :
- Struts1:Struts 1 integrates with JSTL, so it uses the JSTL EL. The EL has basic object graph traversal, but relatively weak collection and indexed property support.
- Struts2:Struts 2 can use JSTL, but the framework also supports a more powerful and flexible expression language called "Object Graph Notation Language" (OGNL).
7.Binding values into views :
- Struts1:Struts 1 uses the standard JSP mechanism for binding objects into the page context for access.
- Struts2:Struts 2 uses a "ValueStack" technology so that the taglibs can access values without coupling your view to the object type it is rendering. The ValueStack strategy allows reuse of views across a range of types which may have the same property name but different property types.
8.Type Conversion :
- Struts1:Struts 1 ActionForm properties are usually all Strings. Struts 1 uses Commons-Beanutils for type conversion. Converters are per-class, and not configurable per instance.
- Struts2:Struts 2 uses OGNL for type conversion. The framework includes converters for basic and common object types and primitives.
9.Validation :
- Struts1:Struts 1 supports manual validation via a validate method on the ActionForm, or through an extension to the Commons Validator. Classes can have different validation contexts for the same class, but cannot chain to validations on sub-objects.
- Struts2:Struts 2 supports manual validation via the validate method and the XWork Validation framework. The Xwork Validation Framework supports chaining validation into sub-properties using the validations defined for the properties class type and the validation context.
10.Control Of Action Execution :
- Struts1:Struts 1 supports separate Request Processors (lifecycles) for each module, but all the Actions in the module must share the same lifecycle.
- Struts2:Struts 2 supports creating different lifecycles on a per Action basis via Interceptor Stacks. Custom stacks can be created and used with different Actions, as needed.
分享到:
相关推荐
NULL 博文链接:https://angkor.iteye.com/blog/1047736
A tree-edit-distance algorithm for comparing simple, closed
nslations as Manipulation and Rewriting- Comparing the Different Translations-论文.zip
很经典的一篇分析和比较蒙哥马利模乘不同的实现方式的文章
Characterizing and Comparing Phylogenies from their Laplacian Spectrum
How to retrieve, update, and delete data quickly and logically using LINQ with side-by-side examples comparing LINQ to existing techniques * Ways to localize your web site in multiple languages ...
CAN FD 传统CAN之比较 CAN-FD比CAN总线的带宽更高,具有与CAN总线相似的控制器接口,这种相似性使ECU供应商不需要对ECU的软件部分做大规模修改,降低了开发难度和成本。CAN-FD是CAN总线的升级换代设计,它继承了CAN...
笔者学习无线网络的学习笔记,draft 0.2版本,后续会陆续更新。准备学习无线网络的可参考,以资共享。 目录如下: 1 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT 4 1.2 PURPOSE 4 1.3 SCOPE 4 1.4 ...
此软件介绍webwork and struts and jsf的区别
Attention Flows:Analyzing and Comparing Attention Mechanisms in Language Models
matlab精度检验代码贝叶斯比较分类器分析 这是Janez Demsar的Python库baycomp的某些功能的小MATLAB实现,可从此处获得:。 该代码可用于使用本文提出的带符号秩检验比较两个分类器: 该存储库包含以下文件: ...
论文 Comparing Linear Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machine. 2002. 欢迎下载。
Beyond technological merits, factors such as deployment readiness, ecosystem maturity and migration feasibility come to light when comparing the aptitude of the two technologies. LTE, LTE-Advanced ...
老外比较的各种低功耗无线技术, 有Bluetooth low energy, zigbee 等目前热门的技术。
randomized BSTs, splay trees, skip lists, multiway tries, B trees, extendible hashing, and much more * Increased quantitative information about the algorithms, giving you a basis for comparing them *...
Comparing Realism and Idealism as Classic Schools of Thought
Comparing Hidden Markov Models and Long Short Term Memory Neural Networks for Learning Action Representations Chapter 9. Dynamic Multi-Objective Optimization with jMetal and Spark: A Case Study ...
层次分析matlab代码比较概率加权的规范模型和描述模型 概率加权描述了主观概率与给定生成过程的客观概率之间的系统失真。 自从作为前景理论的一部分引入以来,概率加权就被认为是一种非理性的认知偏差-决策者做出的...
Search image and compare. The source code of the program, showing an example of image retri on a computer and the allocation of duplicate by comparing them - Author unknown.
Performance Comparing and Analysis for Slot Allocation Model